Sinrock Mary was a successful entrepreneur and leader in her community, defying traditional gender roles and maintaining control over her own life and property.
She played a significant role in the reindeer industry in Alaska, helping to broker a deal to bring reindeer from Siberia and becoming the first Alaska Native couple to have their own herd.
Mary faced numerous challenges, including the tragic loss of her husband and legal battles to protect her ownership of the herd.
The reindeer industry in Alaska experienced a decline due to the Depression and mysteriously crashing herds between the 1930s and '50s, but it remains an important part of Alaska's cultural heritage.
Mary's legacy serves as a testament to her tenacity and strength, and her story highlights the resilience of Alaska Native communities.
In the late 19th century, the US government introduced reindeer to Alaska as part of an effort to provide a more stable food source for the indigenous people.
One notable success story of the program was that of Sinrock Mary, a woman who became known as the “Queen of Reindeer.”
Mary was born Changunak in 1870 to an Iñupiaq mother and a Russian trader father.
She grew up in St. Michael, where she learned traditional skills from her mother and gained language skills from the various foreign ships that visited the island.
By the time she was a teenager, she could speak English, Russian, and Inupiat.
Mary married Charlie Antisarlook and moved to Cape Nome, where they met Captain Michael A. Healy of the US Revenue Cutter Bear.
Healy proposed a plan to bring reindeer from Siberia and teach Alaska Native hunters to become herders, and Mary helped to broker a deal between the cutter and the Siberian reindeer herders.
Mary and Charlie became apprentices in the program and eventually were awarded 500 reindeer of their own, becoming the first Alaska Native couple to have their own herd.
Charlie Antisarlook lost his life during the 1900s epidemic, leaving Mary alone with the herd.
As an Inupiat woman, the reindeer herd would have traditionally been passed on to her husband’s brothers.
However, using “white man’s law,” she was able to legally protect the ownership of her herd, not only from her in-laws but also from many schemers who heard of her recently widowed status.
She was persistently being courted, as many wanted to marry into her wealth, and faced lawsuits, threats, and even attacks on her herd.
Despite these challenges, Mary worked tirelessly to maintain the herd, selling meat to local businesses and the Army station.
Her second husband wasn’t interested in reindeer, so Mary adopted 11 children, among them little ones the epidemics had orphaned.
She transformed them and other Iñupiat into “deer men” able to manage their own herds.
At one point, she reigned over the largest herd in the North Country, with her children helping to uphold Iñupiaq traditions such as gathering berries and greens, fishing, and preparing skins for sewing.
Mary’s story shows the tenacity and strength of a woman who fought to maintain control over her own life and property.
The Alaska Reindeer Service brought a flood of hopeful Iñupiat eager to profit from the trade in venison and fur.
Fall and spring roundups were social events, with families chipping in on tasks such as separating out the respective herds, choosing steers for future draft duty, and castrating newborn calves.
By the late 1920s, many Iñupiat had joined the capitalist venture, owning live animals individually.
However, the Depression and mysteriously crashing herds between the 1930s and ’50s doomed the lucrative herding industry in Alaska.
Reindeer hides earmarked for glove making fetched good prices at Seattle auctions, and thousands of reindeer were slaughtered for their leather alone.
As outside markets collapsed, people fed excess reindeer meat to dogs or used carcasses to bait fox traps.
Mary’s story shows the tenacity and strength of a woman who fought to maintain control over her own life and property.
She defied traditional gender roles and, through her determination and perseverance, became a successful entrepreneur and a leader in her community.
Her legacy lives on in the reindeer industry, which, despite its decline, remains an important part of Alaska’s cultural heritage.
Back to previous
James Madison was initially against a bill of rights, but political pressure led him to change his stance and write one, resulting in the inclusion of the Second Amendment in the U.S. Constitution.
The Second Amendment is rooted in concerns about national defense and the type of military force needed for the nation's security, as early Americans viewed standing armies as tools of tyranny.
Alexander Hamilton's arguments in the Federalist Papers about arming and equipping the general population laid the groundwork for the Second Amendment.
The final version of the Second Amendment has been the subject of extensive debate and confusion due to the removal of crucial phrases and punctuation.
The true intent of the Second Amendment was not about individual gun ownership or personal protection but rather to ensure that a standing army or specially chosen militia would not pose a threat to liberty.
Madame Restell, also known as Caroline Ann Trow Lohman, was a 19th-century midwife and abortion provider who defied societal norms to help women make choices about their bodies.
Restell faced numerous legal battles throughout her career, including charges of administering noxious medicine and procuring miscarriages. She was often portrayed as a cold-hearted murderer, but also had an elaborate network of midwives, doctors, and other professionals who helped her provide safe and affordable reproductive health care to women.
Restell's legacy is complex and controversial. On one hand, she provided crucial reproductive health services to women who had few options for safe and affordable care. On the other hand, her methods were often unsafe, and her business practices were often unethical. Her advocacy for women's rights was also tempered by her belief that women should only have access to reproductive health services if they were married and financially stable.
Restell's story is a reminder of the ongoing struggle for reproductive rights and the complex history of reproductive health care in the United States.
The current debates around reproductive rights, especially in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, make Restell's story and legacy all the more relevant today.
The women's stories are a blend of love, desperation, and madness, highlighting the diversity of female killers' motivations.
The article covers five historical cases: Mary McKinnon, Margaret Garner, Elizabeth Taylor, Edith Thompson, and Christiana Edmunds.
The cases demonstrate the complexities and consequences of their actions, as well as the differing ways society judged and punished them.
The article aims to bring attention to lesser-known female killers and the circumstances that led them to commit such heinous acts.
